<figure class="wp-block-image size-large"><img width="325px" height="183px" srcSet="https://d2ly46a6b1u3g6.cloudfront.net/wp-content/uploads/2026/03/03115734/News-SBFs-Prison-Endorsement-Backfires-Lummis-Warren-Unite-to-Slam-Toxic-Support-for-CLARITY-Act-375x212.webp 375w, https://d2ly46a6b1u3g6.cloudfront.net/wp-content/uploads/2026/03/03115734/News-SBFs-Prison-Endorsement-Backfires-Lummis-Warren-Unite-to-Slam-Toxic-Support-for-CLARITY-Act-662x374.webp 662w, https://d2ly46a6b1u3g6.cloudfront.net/wp-content/uploads/2026/03/03115734/News-SBFs-Prison-Endorsement-Backfires-Lummis-Warren-Unite-to-Slam-Toxic-Support-for-CLARITY-Act.webp 686w" sizes="(max-width: 425px) 150px, 450px" src="https://ll-blog-dev.s3.ap-southeast-2.amazonaws.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/03/03115734/News-SBFs-Prison-Endorsement-Backfires-Lummis-Warren-Unite-to-Slam-Toxic-Support-for-CLARITY-Act-662x374.webp" alt="" class="wp-image-9447"/></figure>


Sam Bankman-Fried has withdrawn his motion for a new trial. He&#x27;s <a href="https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.nysd.590940/gov.uscourts.nysd.590940.594.0.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noopener">shifting his legal strategy</a>. Now he&#x27;s focusing entirely on appealing his conviction and 25-year federal sentence for fraud and misuse of customer funds at FTX.
The former crypto exchange CEO dropped the new trial motion. It was filed in April with the Southern District of New York. But he&#x27;s still pursuing a reassignment request. He claims Judge Lewis Kaplan showed prejudice during his case.
The withdrawal marks a notable pivot. Bankman-Fried is serving his sentence for orchestrating one of the largest financial frauds in crypto history. His legal team isn&#x27;t fighting for a new trial on multiple fronts anymore. They&#x27;re concentrating resources on his Second Circuit appeal. It challenges both his conviction and sentence.
Bankman-Fried wants a new judge. He&#x27;s requesting one to handle any future new-trial issues. Court filings show he claims Judge Kaplan showed bias during proceedings. But the withdrawal of his Rule 33 motion tells a different story. His team views the appeal as a more promising avenue for relief.
The timing matters. The withdrawal came months after the April filing. It indicates a strategic recalibration. Bankman-Fried insisted in court filings that he was the &quot;ultimate author&quot; of the decision. He did consult his parents on the matter. Both his parents are Stanford Law professors. They&#x27;ve been involved in various aspects of his legal battles.
His appeal to the Second Circuit remains active. It&#x27;s his primary hope for overturning the conviction or reducing his sentence. The November 2023 trial resulted in guilty verdicts on seven counts. All related to the collapse of FTX. The exchange imploded in late 2022. Billions in customer funds had been misappropriated.
The case continues to reverberate through the cryptocurrency industry. It&#x27;s a cautionary tale about exchange transparency. And the consequences of mismanaging customer assets. Bankman-Fried&#x27;s legal battles intersect with broader discussions. Crypto regulation. Enforcement priorities.
The reassignment request and appeal could take months to resolve. Maybe longer. Bankman-Fried&#x27;s fate sits in legal limbo. He&#x27;s serving his sentence. His decision to consolidate his legal strategy around the appeal reveals something. His defense team believes higher courts offer better prospects than relitigating the case at the trial level.

Japan Reclassifies Crypto as a Financial Instrument Under FIEA

ARK Invest Q2 2026 DeFi Report: TVL Down 22%, Base Surges

BIS Calls Dollar Stablecoins a Threat to Monetary Sovereignty

ECB Warns Dollar Stablecoins Are Draining European Bank Deposits

Bankman-Fried Withdraws New Trial Motion, Focuses on Appeal

Sam Bankman-Fried withdraws new trial motion, shifting strategy to appeal his 25-year sentence for FTX fraud. Latest on his legal battle.